The Big Cardio Vs Strength Debate: What Women Over 60 Really Need When It Comes To Exercise

TL;DR

Before you orderOffer from Amazon

Get health and wellness essentials delivered free with Prime

• Fast, free delivery on millions of items
• Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
• Member-only deals all year

Start your free Prime trial →Free trial for eligible customers · Cancel anytime

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.Hide

A Sixty and Me report by sports scientist and trainer Patricia Siegel argues that women over 60 benefit from both endurance and strength training, not an either-or routine. It offers a sample weekly schedule, but the guidance is the author’s proposed framework, not a finding from a new clinical study.

A Sixty and Me report by sports scientist and personal trainer Patricia Siegel says women over 60 should include both endurance and strength exercise, rather than choosing between cardio and weights. The guidance also proposes adding safe impact movements for bone health, though it is an expert’s training framework rather than a newly reported clinical trial or official guideline.

Siegel recommends two types of endurance work: moderate, conversational-pace sessions and shorter interval workouts. For the former, she describes a pace at which a person can speak a few sentences but not sing. She suggests about 35 to 45 minutes twice a week, and says walking can be a starting point. Her report argues that people may need to increase pace, choose harder terrain or change activities as their bodies adapt.

For intervals, Siegel describes alternating a hard effort with recovery. One beginner example is 30 seconds of harder effort followed by about a minute at an easier pace, repeated four or five times. She advises limiting interval sessions to one or two times a week in her proposed plan. The report does not specify a single activity for these efforts, which could depend on a person’s fitness and mobility.

For resistance exercise, Siegel recommends three strength sessions per week, using a weight that feels challenging while leaving about two more repetitions possible. She describes progressive overload—gradually changing weight, repetitions, sets or tempo—as a way to keep challenging muscles. She also suggests adding impact movements such as heel drops, skips, hops or jumps when they can be done safely.

Balancing Heart, Muscle and Bone Training

The report’s main point is that cardio and resistance work address different parts of physical fitness. Endurance exercise raises cardiovascular demand, while strength training challenges muscles and can support everyday tasks such as lifting, carrying and getting up from a chair. Impact activity is presented as an additional stimulus for bones, not a replacement for either form of exercise.

That distinction matters for older readers deciding how to use limited exercise time. A routine focused only on walking may not provide the same resistance stimulus as strength training; a weights-only plan, by contrast, may leave endurance work out. Still, the report’s proposed schedule should not be treated as a prescription for every person. Current ability, health conditions, balance and previous injuries can affect which movements and intensity are appropriate.

The Report’s Exercise Framework

Siegel’s article responds to conflicting advice she says women encounter, including claims that they should avoid cardio, rely on walking alone or be wary of strength work because of fragile bones. She argues against those single-focus approaches and presents a combined weekly routine instead. Her credentials in the source are listed as sports scientist, personal trainer and author of a forthcoming book on menopause strength and endurance training.

The report also cites U.S. public-health statistics: in 2022, 13.9% of adults aged 65 and older met both the aerobic and muscle-strengthening guidelines during leisure time. It gives rates of 16.8% for ages 65 to 74, 12.3% for ages 75 to 84 and 6.2% for those 85 and older. Those figures describe guideline participation, not the effectiveness of Siegel’s specific schedule. The supplied material does not include links to the underlying statistical sources.

““the ‘talk test’ is your best measurement.””

— Patricia Siegel, in Sixty and Me

Limits of the Suggested Schedule

The source material does not identify a clinical study testing Siegel’s exact combination of three strength days and multiple endurance sessions. It also does not provide individualized modifications for people with osteoporosis, heart conditions, joint pain, balance problems or other health concerns. The safety and suitability of impact movements, in particular, will vary by person.

The report’s cited participation figures are not accompanied in the supplied material by links to their original data source, and the article’s publication date is unspecified. Readers should distinguish Siegel’s recommendations from formal public-health guidance and seek advice from a qualified health professional before making major changes, especially if they have a medical condition or are new to strenuous exercise.

Adapting the Routine Safely

Siegel’s example week places lower-body strength work on Monday, moderate endurance on Tuesday, upper-body strength on Wednesday, intervals on Thursday, another endurance session on Friday and upper-body strength on Saturday, with Sunday as a rest day. It is an illustration of how the components might fit together, not a requirement that every reader follow the same calendar.

The next step for readers is to match activity and workload to their own circumstances. Anyone considering harder intervals, heavier resistance or jumps can discuss a suitable starting point with a qualified professional. The source report does not announce a follow-up study or a formal update to the guidance.

Key Questions

Does the report say women over 60 should choose cardio or strength training?

No. Siegel recommends both, arguing that endurance and resistance exercise serve different purposes in a weekly routine.

How much endurance exercise does Siegel suggest?

Her framework includes two 35-to-45-minute moderate sessions and one or two interval sessions weekly. This is her proposed plan, not a personalized prescription.

What is the talk test?

In Siegel’s description, a conversational pace allows someone to speak a few sentences but not sing. It is offered as a practical effort guide in her report.

Should everyone over 60 do jumps or hops?

The report lists impact movements as possible additions when they can be done safely. It does not establish that these exercises are suitable for everyone; people with health or mobility concerns should seek qualified advice.

Source: rss